New Jersey DWI Lawyer Blog

With the coming holiday weekend police agencies around the Garden State will be on a heightened alert for partiers and other people driving while intoxicated between picnics and family gatherings. Regardless of the bad economy, drunken driving arrests and summonses are certain to increase in the next couple weeks.

As a New Jersey DWI defense attorney and drunk driver lawyer, my job is to help motorists who have been arrested by state police, municipal patrolmen and other law enforcement personnel for DWI and drug DUI traffic offenses. Many of these arrests occur at so-called sobriety checkpoints, which are frequently set up throughout the New Jersey area.

As part of the upcoming drunk driving enforcement campaign, known as "Over the Limit, Under Arrest," police units have taken to the streets in an effort to cut the instances of driving while under the influence of alcohol or prescription drugs.

According to news reports, law enforcement agencies are already conducting patrols and operating DWI roadblocks until September 6. Police officers in will be cracking down on drunk drivers as part of this summer's campaign. The state and local effort is designed to raise awareness about the dangers of drinking and driving through high-visibility police patrols and public education.

The New Jersey Division of Highway Traffic Safety typically provides grants to local law enforcement agencies throughout the state to run these programs. As one report mentioned, the state's traffic safety division said that last year New Jersey saw 185 fatal DWI-related car crashes -- according to reports, that number represents nearly a third of the almost 600 fatal accidents statewide in 2009. Authorities reported that nearly 70 of those alcohol-related deaths happened during the summer.

Over the Limit, Under Arrest, NorthJersey.com, August 26, 2010

When it comes to driving under the influence of alcohol on New Jersey's public roads, "tolerance" is by no means a word found in the vocabulary of the state's law enforcement community. Similarly the state has no patience for drinking and piloting a boat along the Garden State's coastline, its lakes or rivers and estuaries. DWI on the high seas, so to speak is just as serious an offense as here on land.

What's surprising is that boat owners don't always consider that the same standards which govern drinking and driving on public roads also apply to the operation of watercraft. Boaters must observe the same drunken driving laws as car, motorcycle and truck owners. Because of this, individuals who violate the DWI laws while boating are also subject to arrest for driving while intoxicated. And also included with this are those related offenses, such as prescription drug DUI and breath test refusal when the operator of a boat has a blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) in excess of 0.08 percent.

New Jersey's statutes governing operation of a boat while under the influence of alcohol or drugs are nearly identical to those that pertain to DWI with a motor vehicle. The penalties are also closely related. The implied consent laws that oblige a licensed driver to submit to a breath or blood test following a drunk driving stop also applies to the operator of a watercraft in New Jersey.

On the flip side, because the statutes are nearly identical between motor vehicle and boat operators, the approach to DWI defense is also quite similar. This fact means that a qualified and experienced drunk driving attorney can usually handle boating-related DWI cases with similar results -- certainly something to consider with the Fourth of July holiday just around the corner and summer coming into full swing.

Being arrested, much less convicted, of drunken driving can adversely impact an individual's personal and work life. In fact, careers have been ended by DWI convictions. This just one of many pitfalls as a result of being arrested for DWI or drug DUI here in the Garden State. As a New Jersey drunk driving defense lawyer, I know what happens to motorists arrested and charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol.

Having worked as a municipal prosecutor in years past, I am particularly sensitive when I read that a law enforcement officer has apparently taken advantage of their position to avoid punishment for an alleged crime. It's a sad fact that many times police officers who enforce drunken driving laws will themselves get a "pass" from other officers if stopped for driving while intoxicated.

According to a recent news article, State Police Trooper Sheila McKaig was reportedly stopped 10 times for various offenses including DWI over a period of 14 months, yet she never received a citation in New Jersey for any of those incidents. The most recent one occurred in Atlantic City in 2008 when McKaig was let go after she was pulled over by another officer on suspicion of DWI.

Based on news reports, Police officer Ronald Gorneau spotted McKaig's Toyota swerving and pulled it over. According to the police incident report, McKaig admitted she drank "a lot" before getting behind the wheel. However, after being taken to the Hamilton Township police station in Mays Landing, when was released without charges and taken home by fellow troopers.

New articles indicate that this latest incident was not out of the ordinary. McKaig's Atlantic City stop was the third time in three months during early 2008 that McKaig was stopped while off duty by Hamilton police. Because of so-called professional courtesy, in each of those instances no blood-alcohol content (BAC) test was administered to McKaig, no charges were filed and no tickets were written.

Professional courtesy is attributed to instances where police officers give fellow cops a pass that they would not normally give to the average motorist. The irony is that during this same time that officer McKaig has been given multiple passes after DWI stops, the state of New Jersey and local law enforcement agencies have had a sustained crackdown on drunken driving.

According to news reports, state police officials have stated that the 41-year-old McKaig is a highly respected and decorated trooper who has earned her spot patrolling the Atlantic City Expressway by staying sober the past two years. Although she caught a break from Hamilton police, they said, she used the opportunity to turn her life around. All that can be said here is that very few ordinary New Jersey drivers would have been so lucky as officer McKaig.

Special treatment for trooper in DWI stops, TheDailyJournal.com, April 26, 2010

A recently passed law requires drivers under the age of 21 to place a red sticker on their vehicle's license plates. While the intent of the law appears to be a good-hearted attempt at traffic safety, as a New Jersey DWI defense attorney I tend to side with those claiming the $4 sticker will only invite unwarranted scrutiny and potential discrimination against a segment of the driving public.

When it comes to drunk driving enforcement, New Jersey State Police and municipal police officers are always on the lookout for motorists who may be operating their vehicles while impaired due to alcohol, prescription drugs or controlled dangerous substances (CDS). Young drivers who exhibit traffic behavior suggesting inebriation could quite possibly by singled out due to that red mark on their license plate.

According to an editorial, the new law that took effect on May 1 will must likely lead to discrimination against young drivers which probably wouldn't happen without a red dot. According to the author, New Jersey is one of the top ten safest states for teenage drivers. Referring to the 2001 law that established a curfew for teenagers and significantly decreased the teen driver accident rates, the editorial asks if there is any good reason to put another law into effect.

The law calls for $100 fine for any young driver who does not have the sticker on their plates. A percentage of students across the Garden State may feel that police will be prejudiced when deciding whom to pull over. While teenage driver accident rates due to distracted driving, alcohol use, speeding and other causes may be reduced somewhat, the law is likely to cause a lot of controversy.

Part of the uproar comes from those who point out that 18-year-olds are considered legal adults, so the law tends to separate these individuals from 21 and older adults. By 18, many students are heading off to college, living in dorms or apartments and are essentially functioning on their own. The author asks why this law should affect this small group of legal adults whose just happen to be younger than 21. This would result in subjecting adults to being treated as if they were still teenagers, when all of the while society continues to tell them to just grow up.

There are other concerns, such as making under-21 drivers more distinguishable to pedophiles, sex offenders and rapists who may tend to seek out younger people -- the red-dot sticker would only make it that much easier for criminals to prey on these individuals. The argument is whether or not traffic accident rates go down, will we see an increase in crimes against these younger people, such as rape and sexual assault.

Ultimately, the question is whether or not the effects of the law itself will be worse than the claimed improvements in traffic safety. With the law in effect, only time will tell if New Jersey's lawmakers have made the right decision.

A red dot on cars, HSJ.org, May 4, 2010

When fighting a drunken driving charge, a New Jersey DWI defense lawyer will use all of his experience to help his client get a fair trial. Since being arrested and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol is a serious offense with long-lasting and potentially detrimental effects on a person's life and livelihood, a drunk driving attorney will use the law in an effort to achieve the most favorable outcome.

The court will usually consider the defense's arguments and weigh those against that of the prosecution. A recent New Jersey appellate court decision (STATE V. UZUPIS) upheld one man's appeal of a drunk driving conviction. The circumstances of the arrest appeared to be questionable, which is why the defense files an appeal.

According to the original case tried in an Atlantic County court, Luke J. Uzupis had been arrested after police found him sleeping in his running vehicle. At that time, a police officer spotted the man's car parked at a closed gas station around midnight. The headlights were reportedly will on and the engine was running.

Police reported seeing the man lying back in the driver's seat. He did not respond when the officer knocked on the window, after which the officer opened the door, shook Uzupis and woke him up. Detecting the odor of alcohol on the man's breath, the officer reportedly heard the man say that he had been drinking.

Court records show that Uzupis did poorly on the field sobriety tests and when taken to police headquarters his blood-alcohol content (BAC) was measured at 0.10 percent. Uzupis was convicted of violating N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 in municipal court.

This latest appeal was the second one following the man's conviction in Atlantic County. Regardless, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division upheld the original DWI conviction based on the reasons set forth in Judge Robert Neustadter's original decision.

The appellate court added that the only viable issue was whether the police had waited the twenty minutes required by State v. Chun before administering the Alcotest and whether he had defendant under continuous observation during that time. Both the municipal and the Law Division judges found that the Chun requirements had been met.

The defendant offered expert testimony that the field sobriety tests used were not scientifically reliable, but the State did not offer them as scientifically reliable tests. They were the basis for the officer's observations of intoxication. Proof of a defendant's physical condition of intoxication typically consists of proof through the testimony of a police officer with respect to his or her observations of the defendant.

The court added that a police officer is permitted to give lay opinion testimony as to whether a defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and added that the field sobriety tests certainly provided an acceptable basis for the arrest and subsequent administration of the Alcotest.

Being drunk on the road is always a risky scenario. But as a New Jersey drunk driving defense lawyer and former municipal prosecuting attorney, I know that many Motorists get caught up in DWI arrests unexpectedly. Understanding that being arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol is just the start of a long process is fine, but knowing that being convicted of driving while intoxicated is something you should avoid if at all possible.

The following may help some motorists in the Garden State avoid the pitfalls and legal troubles of being arrested, charged and convicted of drunken driving. Of course, the entire process starts with being pulled over for impaired driving in the first place. Whether you are eventually charged with DWI, drug DUI, breath test refusal, or other drunk driving violation, a traffic stop comes first.

Some people wonder is under what circumstances a patrolman can pull them over for driving drunk. While the officer in charge may not initially be aware of your alcohol consumption or prescription drug use, he can stop you for any number of reasons associate with violations of traffic law.

For instance, the policeman may actually see you running through a traffic light or even make a lane change without signaling. It's well known that certain vehicle maneuvers are signatures of a driver operating under the influence of beer, wine, hard liquor or prescription drugs. These suspicious driving patterns include drifting across the center line, weaving into and out of traffic lanes, driving well below the speed limit, or slowing and speeding up for no apparently legitimate reason.

Whenever a patrolman observes these and other so-called erratic driving behaviors, he may decide to make a completely legal traffic stop to observe you and your vehicle more closely.

Once a law enforcement officer has you stopped by the roadside, he or she will likely ask several questions. Whether you must answer these queries depends on the actual information be requested. You do not have to answer all questions put to you by an officer, but some you are legally required to answer, such as your name, age and whether you have a valid driver's license.

It is important to remember that police officers do not have to read you your Miranda rights until after an arrest has been made. Up until that point, the officer will probably attempt to illicit an incriminating statement from you, such as an admission that you were just coming back from a party or that you had been drinking. Gathering this type of information will help the municipal prosecutor to prove the DWI charges against you in a court of law and likely secure a conviction for drunken driving.

For drivers traveling in Cape May and surrounding New Jersey counties, news reports indicate that the Avalon Police Department and other law enforcement agencies are taking part in a DUI prevention campaign until March 17, St. Patrick's Day. Known worldwide as a day of celebration, Saint Paddy's Day can be a busy time for local police and state law enforcement agencies focused on arresting drivers found driving drunk, as well as violating other DUI and DWI laws.

As a New Jersey drunk driving defense lawyer, I have seen the effects of these enhanced enforcement campaigns. Many motorists are picked up on the road or at sobriety checkpoints, also known as DWI roadblocks. The penalties for drunk driving or drug DUI convictions can be very stiff and can also include jail time for repeat offenders. It's always a good idea to seek professional legal advice if you or someone you know is arrested or receives a summons for driving while intoxicated.

According to reports, the Avalon Police Department is currently participating in an impaired driving prevention operation until the 17th. It's no coincidence that this campaign coincides with St. Patrick's Day, which police know involves the consumption of alcoholic beverages by many motorists.

In order to help make the holiday safe for the driving public, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has reportedly developed a safety program for local police agencies to put into effect during the month of March. This effort is based, according to the NHTSA, on statistics that show alcohol plays a major role in accident-related fatalities on St. Patrick's Day.

In 2008, 37 percent of motorists and motorcycle riders who were involved in fatal traffic wrecks on St. Patrick's Day had a blood-alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08 percent or more (0.08 is the legal threshold for being drunk in New Jersey, as well as other states around the country). According to reports, there were 134 fatal accidents on St. Patrick's Day in 2008, 50 of which involved at least one motor vehicle operator who was legally legally drunk at the time.

Police recommend the following steps to having a safe St. Patrick's Day:

• Plan a safe way home before the festivities begin
• Before drinking, choose a designated sober driver
• Leave your car keys at home
• If you believe you are impaired away from home, call a sober friend or family member to get a safe ride home
• If you know someone who is about to drive or ride while impaired, take their keys and help them make other arrangements to get to their destination safely

Avalon Police Will Take Part in DUI Prevention Campaign, CapeMayCountyHerald.com, March 03, 2010

Lower County Police recently reported the arrest of a Mays Landing, NJ, man in connection with an early morning car crash on January 23. Based on news reports, 41-year-old Joseph W. Rothenberger was allegedly intoxicated when he crashed his 2004 Mercedes Benz into a tree. Police investigating the accident presume that Rothenberger left a North Cap May residence and was traveling northbound on Deborah Avenue at a high rate of speed. He reportedly crashed his vehicle in the 200 block of Suzanne Avenue when he apparently lost control and ran off the roadway.

As drunk driving defense lawyers, I and my colleagues have seen this kind of DWI scenario played out again and again all across New Jersey. In this instance, police reports indicate that the supposedly drunken man's vehicle crossed the curb and drive over a sidewalk, eventually ending up in a neighbor's yard and causing substantial damage to the lawn and a chain link fence before hitting a tree.

Police allege that the driver attempted to flee on foot from the scene of the accident. According to reports, Rothenberger was detained by several other neighbors in the area and held until police arrived. The neighbors indicated that a male and female passenger in the back seat of the vehicle also fled the scene of the accident and apparently ran back to the residence on Deborah Avenue.

As a result fo the accident, Rothenberger received abrasions to his face, but refused to be transported to the hospital by emergency responders. Reports indicate that the man was uncooperative and belligerent with officers at the scene and when told he was being placed under arrest for driving while intoxicated, he attempted to physically resist his arrest.

Rothenberger was taken to the Lower Township Police Department where he was processed and charged with DWI, resisting arrest, refusal to submit to a breath test, reckless driving, leaving the scene of an accident and failure to report an accident.

Hamilton man arrested following Cape DWI crash, ShoreNewsToday.com, January 27, 2010

Man Arrested for Leaving Scene of Accident, DWI in Lower, CapeMayCountyHerald.com, January 25, 2010

New Jersey has added another weapon to its arsenal of drunk driving laws, making even first-time DWI convictions more onerous for those caught driving while intoxicated. As a New Jersey drunk driving defense attorney and motorist myself, I've seen the aftermath of accidents caused by impaired drivers. At the same time, I also understand how even a single DWI or drug DUI conviction can haunt a person for many years to come.

The latest law coming out of Trenton last week now makes it mandatory that anyone convicted of a drinking and driving offense must have their vehicle fitted with a breathalyzer ignition interlock device. Not only does the stigma of a DWI conviction cost an individual in court fines and increased insurance premiums, now there is the added embarrassment and inconvenience of starting one's vehicle. All of which makes it imperative to seek the services of a DWI defense lawyer.

According to reports, legislation has now been passed and signed into law by acting Governor Sweeney to add mandatory ignition interlocks for all drunk driving offenses in New Jersey. Known as "Ricci's Law" in honor of the Egg Harbor Township teen killed by a hit-and-run drunk driver, the bill was signed into law on Thursday, January 14.

The now-mandatory ignition interlocks incorporate a breathalyzer-type device that only allows a car to be started is the driver is sober. When attempting to start the vehicle, the driver must first blow into the device. If the interlock registers above a specific blood-alcohol content (BAC) -- usually greater than 0.02 percent to 0.04 percent -- the vehicle is rendered inoperable.

Under the measure, any person convicted of drunk driving will be required to install an ignition interlock device in any motor vehicle principally owned by the offender, though first-time offenders would have to have a BAC of at least 0.15 percent. In such cases, the court will require first-time offenders to install the interlock for a period of six months to one year.

The previous law imposed driver's license suspensions on all persons convicted of drunk driving. That penalty is still in effect.

Under the new law, the interlock device will also be mandatory in all cases and will be required to be in effect during the period of time that the license is suspended. In addition, persons who are convicted of refusing the breath test also will be required to install an ignition interlock device.

Bill Requiring Ignition Breathalyzer For DUI Convictions Now Law, NJToday.com, January 15, 2010

Driving while intoxicated, DWI or driving under the influence, whatever term you use it all adds up to lost driving privileges and extensive fines, not to mention possible job loss and being disgraced in the eyes of your family or local community. Here in New Jersey, being convicted of a drunk driving charge can result in a range of possible actions by the court to punish the convicted drunk driver.

As a New Jersey drunk driving defense attorney my firm represents hundreds of individuals every year in cases of driving under the influence of alcohol. A number of these cases involve human as well as social costs. Even under the best of circumstances, the financial cost of a DWI conviction can result in expensive court fines as well as higher insurance rates for years to come.

The stigma alone of a alcohol-related DWI or drug DUI conviction can affect a person's standing in the community, possible loss of a job, or potential damage to relationships with family and friends.

A DWI conviction can be expensive. Fines and penalties for additional drunk driving convictions are large, but even first-time offenders can feel the sting. Below are just a few of the potential monetary costs that can be expected for a variety of drunk driving offenses, according to the State of New Jersey (Remember that jail time or community service may also be included if the court deems it necessary).

A first DWI offense will typically cost a motorist $250 to $400 in fines for a blood-alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08 percent or higher (but less than 0.10 percent). This fine rises to $300-$500 if your BAC is 0.10 percent or higher. Plus, there is an automobile insurance surcharge of $1,000 per year, which will last for three years.

Being convicted for a second DWI offense will get you a $500 to $1,000 fine, plus an automobile insurance surcharge of $1,000 per year for three years.

Conviction for a third DWI offense will result in a $1,000 fine, as well as an auto insurance surcharge of $1,500 per year for three years.

If you refuse to submit to a breath test, be prepared to hand the state between $300 and $500 for your first offense. This fine ranges between $500 and $1,000 for a second offense, and $1,000 for the third. In all instances, the insurance surcharge applies -- this will total $1,000 per year for three years for the first and second offenses; and $1,500 for the third offense. If you are convicted of driving on a suspended license due to a previous DWI your fine will typically be $500.

All of these fines are in addtioin to several other surcharges that the state applies to every DWI conviction:

• $100 -- Drunk driving enforcement fund
• $100 -- Motor Vehicle Commission restoration fee
• $100 -- Intoxicated Driving Program fee
• $50 -- Violent Crimes Compensation Fund fee
• $75 -- Safe and Secure Community Program fee
• $100 -- $50 for the state of New Jersey and $50 for the municipality in which the conviction was obtained

Drunken driving, or DWI (driving while intoxicated), is a serious offense in New Jersey. From Atlantic City to Newark, law enforcement agencies and state legislators are getting more and more tough with people who drive under the influence of alcohol. As a New Jersey drunk driving defense lawyer, I and my colleagues understand the dangers of driving under the influence of alcohol or prescription drugs (DUI or drug DWI).

Recently, the New Jersey state legislature has taken on the task of making those convicted of fatal DWI traffic accidents go to jail and stay there longer. These days a conviction in the Garden State for operating a motor vehicle while inebriated is an expensive proposition; killing another person while drunk usually calls for jail time -- soon that jail term may be longer than many expect.

According to news reports, a bill entitled "Josh's and Craig's Law" could increase the penalties for motorists who cause a fatality as a result of a DWI traffic accident. The new legislation is being sponsored in the state Senate by Senator Jeff Van Drew and in the Assembly by Assemblymen Matt Milam and Nelson Albano.

The bill takes its name from Josh Moren and Craig Lozier, who died within weeks of each other in similar DWI-related accidents in Cape May County last year. The common thread, according to news reports, is that these two individuals were apparently killed by drivers who allegedly were driving under the influence of a large amount of alcohol, or a mix of drugs and alcohol.

Moren, who was 18, died in June of 2008 along Route 47 in Middle Township just three weeks after graduating from Sacred Heart High School. He was killed by 48-year-old Laura Lippie of Bridgeton, NJ. Lippie is currently serving more than sevens years in prison at Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women.

According to news articles, the new law would mandate a minimum sentence of 10 years for an DWI offense involving high levels of intoxication, such as Lippie was convicted for. Based on court records, Lippie pleaded guilty to having spent the day before the accident drinking vodka. Her blood-alcohol content (BAC) at the time of the accident was measured at 0.37 percent -- more than four times the legal limit.

Several weeks after Moren was killed, Lozier was hit by a drunk driver as he was riding a motorcycle on Route 47 near his home in Cape May Court House. Police reportedly filed DWI and drug possession and distribution charges against Nicholas Golden, the driver who hit Lozier. Golden was subsequently indicted on first-degree aggravated manslaughter charges, which carries between 10 and 30 years in prison. At the time of the news article, Golden was free on bail pending trial.

Continue reading "New Jersey DWI News: Pending Legislation could Increase Jail Sentences for Fatal DWI Accidents" »

As a New Jersey drunk driving defense lawyer my job is to help motorists accused of DWI or driving under the influence of alcohol. My office also handles drug DUI (driving under the influence of prescription drugs, as well as marijuana and other substances). The road to a drunk driving conviction is now necessarily a long one, but it has many steps. I'll outline the process here to help explain the usual stages of a DWI case.

Arrest
Whether you live in Newark, Atlantic City, Trenton or any of the dozens of cities and towns throughout the state, every DWI charge starts with an arrest. You should know that for a drunk driving traffic stop to be valid it stop must be supported by what the law defines as reasonable suspicion that a motor vehicle violation has been committed.

As per State v. Carpentieri, New Jersey's Supreme Court held that a police officer must have an articulable and reasonable suspicion that a traffic law violation has in fact occurred before he or she may effect a DWI stop. Furthermore, once a motorist is stopped, that law enforcement officer must have probable cause to believe the driver of the vehicle is intoxicated before he or she can make an arrest and conduct a breathalyzer test.

Bear in mind that there is no right to advice from counsel at this early stage and therefore an attorney, in particular, an experienced DWI lawyer, will be of no assistance at this point in time.

Arraignment
The next step following an arrest for DWI, DUI, or breath test refusal in New Jersey is the arraignment. During this step, the defendant receives a Complaint. Once the Complaint is filed, the defendant makes his or her initial appearance at arraignment where the court informs the defendant of the charges. At this same time, the defendant is informed of his rights under the law and then he or she will enter a plea of guilty or not guilty.

If you hire a drunk driving defense lawyer to represent you, the initial appearance can normally be waived. The arraignment can be "adjourned" by the attorney sending a letter of representation to the Court advising it that you are represented, were advised of your rights, and that you are entering a "Not Guilty" plea.

Continue reading "Arrested for Drunk Driving in New Jersey? A DWI Conviction is a Multi-step Process" »

The coming holiday season is well known for its parties and family gatherings, and despite the poor economy drunk driving arrests are sure to surge during the next few weeks. In response, New Jersey DWI enforcement units are taking to the streets in an effort to reduce the instance of driving while intoxicated. As leading drunk driving defense lawyers, my firm has experience in a wide range of DWI and drug DUI defense. Recent news of the "Over the Limit, Under Arrest" campaign is evidence that drunk driving patrols will be working overtime in the Garden State.

According to news reports, law enforcement agencies across the state are already conducting saturation patrols and operating sobriety checkpoints, also known as sobriety roadblocks, as part of the nationwide drunk driving campaign. Enforcement will continue, say police, through January 3, 2010.

New Jersey's Division of Highway Traffic Safety is funding the local initiative, which began in 1999. According to reports, the division provides $5,000 grants to law enforcement agencies to cover overtime for those officers assigned to DWI patrols or checkpoints.

To illustrate the extent of the effort, 110 Jersey police agencies will receive grants, according to Pam Fischer, the division's director. The campaign will also include the New Jersey State Police.

A police spokesperson indicated that the holiday DWI crackdown will see officers on the street spending about four hours looking for "possible alcohol-impaired drivers" along with their regular patrols. "It's important that we keep everybody safe on the roads, especially near the holidays," said Vineland police Sgt. Vince Solazzo of the city's Traffic Safety Unit.

Police remind the public that last year, 11,773 people across the United States died in crashes involving a drunk driving, this is according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). According to reports, New Jersey saw 165 people killed in alcohol-related crashes in 2008, down from 195 in '07.

Extra drunken-driving patrols coming to South Jersey, CourierPostOnline.com, December 8, 2009

Drivers across the New Jersey area, including Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean and Atlantic counties, may see an increase in police presence on the state's highways and surface streets during this coming Saturday, October 10. In a nationwide campaign known as "Put the Brakes on Fatalities Day," law enforcement agencies will be out in force looking for traffic violations and targeting zero fatalities for one full day. This effort may include sobriety checkpoints in various areas.

As a citizen of New Jersey, as well as a DWI defense attorney, I am always happy to see traffic deaths decrease. However, I know that some motorists can get a raw deal from local and state police during campaigns such as this. That is why I always encourage people arrested for drunk driving to contact a legal professional for advice and counsel.

According to news reports, "Put the Brakes on Fatalities Day" will see police departments statewide emphasizing and enforcing all traffic laws, including seatbelt usage, obeying the posted speed limit, avoiding distractions such as cellphone use while driving, and not getting behind the well when intoxicated.

Police data show that 591 individuals died in traffic accidents in New Jersey just last year. While this number may seem high, it represents a 19-percent decline from 2007, and also marks the lowest number of recorded motor vehicle deaths in the state since 1948, according to reports.

As with last year's campaign, law enforcement agencies throughout the state will be reporting crash information -- such as total number of crashes, injuries crashes and fatalities -- for the 24-hour period of October 10. Police will convey that information to the Division of Highway Traffic Safety, the state's lead traffic safety agency. The division will then compile and post this information on its website.

Approximately 66 percent of the 496 police agencies in the state, as well as the state police, reported crash data following last year's "Put the Brakes on Fatalities Day." A total of 1,065 crashes took place in New Jersey on that day, resulting in 201 injuries and two fatalities.

Lower Township Police promote annual Put the Brakes on Fatalities Day, ShoreNewsToday.com, September 24, 2009

A man initially arrested for DWI at a sobriety checkpoint in November 2008, the charges for which were dropped four months later, has sued for wrongful arrest. As a New Jersey DWI defense attorney, I have represented clients over the years who have faced similar circumstances. In the case of Tyrone Foxworth's drunk driving arrest, the claimant says that Officer Kristina Ramsi falsely arrested the Somers Point man and caused him to be prosecuted in a malicious fashion, thus violating his rights under both the Fourth and Fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution.

According to reports, this individual was still charged with drunk driving even after Foxworth's blood alcohol content (BAC) registered a reading of 0.00 percent via a Breathalyzer test at the Northfield police station just 15 minutes following his arrest at the checkpoint. Police records show that no blood or urine was taken for a drug test at time, because there was no drug-recognition expert available that evening.

Based on news accounts, Foxworth was driving with two friends when his vehicle was flagged down at a multi-jurisdictional DWI checkpoint along Shore Road around 3am on Thanksgiving morning. As per standard procedures, every fifth vehicle was being flagged and pulled over, according to police. The complaint states that Foxworth was instructed to pull into a secondary check area by Absecon Officer James Laughlin.

According to court records, when Ramsi asked if Foxworth had been drinking he responded no. Ramsi then requested that Foxworth perform several sobriety tests, including various "balance" tests and a "horizontal gaze" test -- the complaint claims that "neither of the tests can accurately provide probable cause for this determination (of DWI)." Foxworth was subsequently arrested and charged with DWI and reckless driving.

It is important to note that in a previous court hearing, in which the charges were dropped, Judge Matthew Powals made sure to enter into the court record that there was "no observed improper behavior" on Foxworth's part.

This is a perfect example of why it is imperative to retain an experienced drunk driving defense lawyer to handle a DWI, drug DUI or breath test refusal case. Charges made are not always accurate, but without proper representation, an innocent person could be convicted of a serious offense, one that could affect that individual's future in more ways than one.

Man with 0.00% blood alcohol content sues over Northfield DWI charge, PressofAtlanticCity.com, August 26, 2009