Our DWI Credentials are Exceptional, 7 DWI Defense Lawyers
Our work has been featured in
The Star Ledger
CNBC
LAW & ORDER
Asbury Park Press
ABC
House M.D.
USA Today

A Montville, New Jersey, woman was recently sentenced to 48 months in jail after being convicted for her third drunk driving arrest as well as vehicular assault charges after hitting a police officer and two other vehicles in 2008. Having defended many New Jersey motorists accused of driving under the influence of alcohol, I can only say that this type of case needed serious DWI defense work.

According to news reports, Andora Needleman, 47, pled guilty back in August to a couple counts of vehicular assault, as well as driving while intoxicated, plus leaving the scene of an accident. One assault charge was for hitting Officer Kevin Milley, while the second was for hitting a car with a five-year-old child on board.

Superior Court Judge Salem Vincent Ahto revoked Needleman’s driver’s license for 10 years, which begins when she is released from prison. She is expected to apply for early release from prison under the state’s Intensive Supervision Program, which is a stringent form of parole.

Montclair

A resident of Wayne, NJ, was stopped by police just after 12am on September 21 for allegedly running three stop signs. As a drunk driving defense lawyer with offices throughout New Jersey, I know that this kind of behavior is difficult to explain simply. However, my firm has represented many individuals arrested for DWI under similar circumstances, which is not uncommon.

According to police reports, the 44-year-old man was driving a 2006 Honda CR-V when he was pulled over by law enforcement officers at Valley Road and Church Street. Officers reportedly could smell alcohol on the man, who also exhibited other signs of possible intoxication, police said. When asked, the suspect explained that he had consumed two beers at a local bar earlier that evening.

Comedian Artie Lange who was involved in a minor Ocean County car accident last July recently pled guilty in Toms River municipal court to drug DUI charges, according to news reports. The comic, who has made frequent guest appearances on Howard Stern’s radio show, admitted to driving under the influence of a habit-producing drug in a minor traffic accident. The accident happened about 40 miles southeast of Trenton, NJ.

Whether it’s DWI or drug DUI, it is always important to have an experienced New Jersey drunk driving defense lawyer at your side. In Lange’s case, he admitted to being under the influence of legal prescription sleeping pills that he had taken the night prior to the wreck. Municipal court judge, James Ligouri, revoked the comic’s driving privileges for seven months.

The events leading up to this point were covered extensively in the media. Essentially, Toms River police arrested Lange for DUI after the 2009 Nissan Sentra he was driving ran into the back of a Pontiac Grand Am during in the afternoon of July 16.

The east side of Red Bank, NJ, was the site of a police chase following an initially unsuccessful DWI traffic stop. According to reports, Captain Darren McConnell of the Red Bank traffic safety unit identified a Chevy pickup moving erratically around 2am on Saturday, September 26, just prior to running a stop sign at Wallace and McLaren streets.

As a New Jersey DWI defense attorney having defended numerous motorists charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, this is a typical scenario for an early morning drunk driving arrest. However, fleeing a police officer only complicates matters for a defendant accused of driving under the influence. In this day and age, there is no sense to making matters worse by adding resisting arrest to the list of charges.

In this case, Captain McConnell attempted to pull over Jesse Rowe, 21, who was driving his vehicle in an allegedly erratic manner. As McConnell started to pull Rowe’s truck over the suspect accelerated away in an apparent attempt to evade arrest. Pursuing Rowe eastbound on McLaren Street, then north on William Street and east again on Mechanic, the entire chase was less than a half mile, according to police reports.

I’ve said it here before. As a New Jersey DWI defense lawyer, I have little patience for any malfeasance on the part of law enforcement officers or members of the prosecutor’s office when it comes to upholding the laws that they are responsible for enforcing. Every individual accused of drunk driving or other alcohol-related offense should be treated equally without favor or discrimination. A recent news story about a couple police officers from the Randolph Township police department brought this to mind.

According to reports, former officers Shawn Boyhan and Stephen J. Kepler appeared in a Morristown courtroom on October 19 having been accused of destroying, concealing or altering official records. The two were forced to give up their jobs with the township, put on probation for one year and ordered to perform community service for trying to cover up the drunk-driving arrest of a fellow officer’s relative.

The 31-year-old Boyhan entered a conditional guilty plea, saying that after he stopped a motorist on August 21 he learned the driver was related to another Randolph police officer. Boyhan said he spoke with Kepler, 49, and decided to “unarrest” the motorist and let him go. No breath tests were conducted and no paperwork filled out.

Every month dozens of drunk driving and drug DUI arrests occur in Morris Township, NJ, as well as across the Garden State. Police departments and state law enforcement agencies have a very low tolerance for driving while intoxicated. As an experienced New Jersey DWI defense attorney, my firm has defended hundreds of motorists accused of driving under the influence of alcohol. Many of their DWI stories are reflected in the various news reports shown below.

Morris Township

A 35-year-old local man was stopped by police after he was observed driving his 1997 Ford erratically and at high speed along Madison Avenue around 10pm on a Saturday evening. Upon pulling the driver over, police said he showed clear signs of drunkenness. According to reports, when the patrolman attempted to place the driver under arrest, he allegedly resisted. Additional officers were called in and the suspect was subdued and taken into custody. He was taken to headquarters where he refused to provide breath samples. Police charged him with breath test refusal, resisting arrest, failure to stop when signaled by police, failure to change address with the DMV, failure to keep right, improper passing and reckless driving, police said. He was released pending further court action, police said.

New Jersey motorists charged with drunk driving may be surprised to learn that blood alcohol content (BAC) measuring devices such as the Alcotest machine can return falsely elevated BAC readings that don’t reflect an individual’s actual state of sobriety. As a New Jersey DWI defense attorney, I find that a percentage of people charged with driving under the influence of alcohol were not actually legally drunk due to faulty breathalyzer results.

Body weight, time since you last drink and other factors can greatly affect the results of the Alcotest device, a breathalyzer machine commonly used by New Jersey law enforcement agencies. One unexpected cause of false readings can be smoking tobacco.

There is some research that points to smokers as having a greater chance of being accused of DWI due to high BAC readings from a breath test. Actually, breathalyzers like the Alcotest machine don’t really measure alcohol. Their design is such that they detect any compound containing the molecular structure of compounds in the methyl group — which these devices take to be alcohol. This is extremely important for motorists who smoke, because these machines cannot distinguish the difference between alcohol and acetaldehyde.

Alcohol-related injury accidents are one of the more serious types of DWI-related traffic offenses. Recently a Hackensack, NJ, resident was charged with driving while intoxicated and as well as allegedly causing a two-car crash on the Garden State Parkway that resulted in injury to the suspect, his passenger and the driver of a second vehicle. As a New Jersey drunk driving defense lawyer, my firm has represented people who have found themselves in similar circumstances.

According to reports, the accident occurred a little after 10pm on Friday, September 25 in Ocean County around the 74-mile marker on the Garden State Parkway. Police reports show that 40-year-old John Twomey was driving southbound in his 1996 Infiniti with Kevrye Lantigua, 18, from Perth Amboy.

The investigation was still underway at the time of the news report, however it appears that Twomey’s vehicle struck a second vehicle driven by Christine Doran, a 35-year-old resident of Barnegat. Authorities say that emergency responders tending to the victims noticed the scent of alcohol on Twomey’s breath, as well as open containers of alcohol were in the Infinity. According to police reports, the man admitted to drinking Bacardi rum while in the vehicle.

Based on a recent poll found on AAA Mid-Atlantic’s website, 61 percent of respondents said individuals with first-time drunk driving convictions should be required to have a breathalyzer-ignition interlock device installed on their vehicle. A larger 85 percent felt that an ignition interlock should be mandatory only for subsequent offenses. As a New Jersey DWI defense attorney, I have represented clients charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, many of whom were unjustly accused due to inaccuracies inherent with breath testing machines.

The point here is that vehicle-installed breath testing devices are not necessarily more accurate, or even as accurate as the units used by law enforcement. Yet judges are requiring many people convicted of drunk driving to have these interlock devices installed. The problem I see going forward is how accurate can the in-car units be when the validity of the more expensive and complicated Alcotest and other breath-testing machines have recently been called into question?

From the results of the AAA poll, it would appear that popular opinion is tilted against those accused of driving while intoxicated, and there is no doubt that New Jersey drivers charged with a DWI offense face rather stiff penalties. But to be judged fit to drive by a possibly less accurate machine may be a burden itself.

I colleague was able to achieve an excellent result in a DWI case recently. In this regard, the defendant had a blood alcohol content of .115 while striking a pedestrian. The rub is that the pedestrian was also intoxicated, possessing a BAC of .26. The allegations were that the deceased walked into oncoming traffic with little to no warning. A grand jury refused to indict the defendant on a felony offense of death by auto so the case was remanded to municipal court. The defendant was found guilty of DWI and was sentenced to thirty (30) days in jail. The Asbury Park Press reported this weekend that the defendant’s appeal of the sentence was denied.

Following the initial ruling in this matter, I received several offensive comments on my blog, as well as emails of similar attack. I assume that the related individuals felt we were a good target to voice displeasure given our prominence as NJ DWI Lawyers. While it might be hard for the complaining individuals to accept, causation is a requirement in order to hold an individual criminally accountable for death by auto. An indictment was not returned in this case because a Grand Jury panel of citizens heard the evidence and simply found that, although the defendant was intoxicated, he was not the cause of the fatality. The driver was therefore not indicted. Notwithstanding, the defendant is going to jail for thirty (30) days.

I certainly understand a level of frustration on the part of some given the fact that the defendant was intoxicated, however, the law cuts both ways. The defendant here was not guilty of assault by auto and therefore the most that could be imposed in terms of jail was significantly limited. The municipal court judge found that thirty days was appropriate. The situation could have gone much different but the facts simply did not support such a result.

Contact Information